Clients bringing motion to dismiss action pursuant to anti-SLAPP legislative provision — How the public interest threshold in defamation defences and Canadian anti-SLAPP regimes should be applied to online consumer expression — Whether the Court of Appeal was entitled to reframe the merits-based hurdle and public interest weighing exercise of the anti-SLAPP regime in a way that reduces the plaintiffs’ burden. — granted 10/23/2025 — Supreme Advocacy acted as agent for the Respondent.
Read the lower court decision from the ONCA here.