Whether intermediate resources and family type resources, even though characterized as service providers, must have full benefit of freedom of association guaranteed by s. 2(d) of Canadian Charter of Rights and s. 3 of Charter of human rights and freedoms, including right to bargain collectively, right to strike and, failing this, access to meaningful dispute resolution mechanism — Whether legislature’s characterization of intermediate resources and family-type resources as service providers cannot have effect of depriving them of right to constitutional protection of collective bargaining, strike or access to meaningful dispute resolution process. — dismissed 09/18/2025 — Supreme Advocacy acted as agent for the Applicant.
Read the lower court decision from the QCCA here.