Contracts: Time-of-the-Essence Clauses
Cold Ocean Salmon Inc. v. Nova Fish Farms Inc., 2025 NLCA 28 (42032)
Cold Ocean Salmon Inc. agreed to sell several trout farms to Nova Fish Farms Inc. under an agreement of purchase and sale. The trout farms were on property leased from the provincial government and licenced and regulated by both federal and provincial governments. Sale of the farms was conditional on government approval. The agreement was signed in February 2020 and did not state a fixed or outside closing date. Instead, it provided the closing would occur seven days following the completion of certain conditions precedent including receiving government approval. The agreement required each party to take the necessary steps to obtain government approval as promptly as practicable following signing and the parties were to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain approval before closing. The agreement included a clause stating time shall be of the essence of the agreement. Neither party took any steps to effectuate the agreement until June 2021 when Nova Fish submitted transfer applications to the provincial government. The government approved the applications in October 2021. Nova Fish told Cold Ocean’s solicitor of the approval in December 2021 and Nova Fish wanted to proceed to close the transaction. In May 2022, Cold Ocean told Nova Fish it did not intend to proceed with the transaction. Nova Fish sued Cold Ocean seeking specific performance of the agreement. Cold Ocean pleaded in defence Nova Fish was in breach of the agreement because of its delay in obtaining government approval and Cold Ocean was entitled to terminate the agreement because of that breach. At a summary trial, it was determined Nova Fish breached the agreement because it did not act as promptly as practicable, or use reasonable commercial efforts to obtain government approval. The time is of the essence clause applied to the terms of the agreement and entitled Cold Ocean to terminate the agreement. Nova Fish’s action for specific performance was dismissed. The N.L.C.A. allowed Nova Fish’s appeal. The trial judge’s finding Nova Fish breached the agreement was not disturbed; however, it was determined the trial judge erred by finding the time is of the essence clause applied to the obligations that Nova Fish breached and the trial judge erred in finding that Cold Ocean was entitled to terminate the agreement because of Nova Fish’s breach of those obligations. The N.L.C.A. granted Nova Fish’s request for an order of specific performance. “The application for leave to appeal…is granted with costs in the cause.”