Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the trial judge erred by not applying the statutory presumption in s. 320.31(4) of the Criminal Code to the s. 320.14(3) offence — Whether the Court of Appeal erred by allowing the respondent to raise new issues and argument for the first time on appeal — Whether the Court of Appeal erred in law — Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the trial judge did not consider willful blindness? — dismissed 08/24/2023 — Supreme Advocacy acted as agent for the Applicant.
Read the lower court decision from the NSCA here.