Whether the lower courts erred in deciding that necessity is not an element of s. 193(2)(b) of the Criminal Code and that the police acted reasonably in the circumstances — Whether the Court of Appeal erred in law in supporting the trial judge’s requirement for direct evidence of falsity — Whether the verdict was proven beyond a reasonable doubt — Whether the burden of proof was reversed — Whether there was a failure to consider the absence of evidence from the prosecutors — Whether the lower courts erred in law in their analysis  — dismissed 12/09/2021 — Supreme Advocacy acted as agent for the Applicant.

Read the lower court decision from the ONCA here.