Support recipient having dissipated assets received on equalization and having little income of her own — Does discretionary nature of s. 15.2 (1) require the court to order security in the form of life insurance at all times that a spousal support order is granted? — Can the court do so without evidence or consideration of any factors? — Can a judge order that a payor obtain a life insurance policy as security if it is not in existence at the time of the application or appeal? — Is the court required to invoke the needs based exception to double dipping in Boston when a support recipient has not made any attempt to use equalized assets in an income producing way? — dismissed 02/18/2021 — Supreme Advocacy acted as agent for the Applicant.
Lower court decision unreported.