Causing death during forcible confinement — Swarming — What constitutes a continuous act of confinement — What should a court assess in reaching a determination that a confinement was continuous – How to apply the requirement that a confinement was continuous and sufficiently distinct from the act of killing itself in the context of group attacks — Whether the 25-year parole ineligibility was grossly disproportionate punishment that offends s. 12 of Charter? — dismissed 02/11/2021 — Supreme Advocacy acted as agent for the Applicant.

Read the lower court decision from the ABCA here.