Whether lower courts erred in application of hybrid approach by failing to focus on circumstances of child and failing to give weight to role of the father contrary to Office of the Children’s Lawyer v. Balev, 2018 SCC 16 — Whether lower courts erred in weighing the factual matrix after date of wrongful retention and in failing to apply the entire test required — Whether lower courts failed to examine all factual circumstances and excluded factors that favoured Texas — Whether lower courts failed to consider child’s links and connections to both countries. — dismissed 07/09/2020 — Supreme Advocacy acted as agents for the Respondent.

Read the lower court decision from the NBCA here.