Whether, in context of agreement like that made in Pierringer v. Hoger, 21 Wis. 2d 182, 124 N.W. 2d 106 (1963), endorsed in Sable Offshore Energy Inc. v. Ameron International Corp., [2013] 2 S.C.R. 623, non-settling defendant can be assigned persuasive burden of proof against settling defendant in relation to non-settling defendant’s alleged liability — Whether persuasive burden was imposed on non-settling defendant here — Whether Pierringer agreement can justifiably disadvantage non-settling defendant’s right to defend through trial. —  dismissed 11/28/19 — Supreme Advocacy acted as agent for the Applicant.

Read the lower court decision from the NSCA here.