What is proper interpretation of ss. 78(1)(c) and 78(2)(d) of Metis Settlements Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. M‑14 pursuant to which applicant was refused membership because his free expression was inconsistent with “preserving a peaceful community”? — Whether there is a universal human right to retain one’s homeland — Whether Resolution 18 guarantees rights to membership application and access to the Métis Settlement Lands for all Historical Alberta Powley compliant Métis in Canada? — What are rights of Historical Alberta Powley compliant Métis within s. 35 of Constitution Act, 1982 — Whether there are priority rights over non‑historical Alberta Powley compliant Métis in Canada regarding hunting rights and access to Métis Settlement Lands? — dismissed 11/07/19 — Advocacy Supreme Advocacy acted as agent for the Respondent.
Read the lower court decision from the ABCA here.